bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#55930: 29.0.50; Removing some items from Emacs FAQ for MS Windows


From: Arash Esbati
Subject: bug#55930: 29.0.50; Removing some items from Emacs FAQ for MS Windows
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:42:58 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
>> Cc: 55930@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 11:23:28 +0200
>> 
> This again treats the two flavors of MinGW as equal, which I think is
> not what we want.  My suggestion is to make it shorter and more to the
> point by saying something like
>
>   We recommend that you use MinGW64, unless you need to build Emacs
>   for running on versions of MS-Windows before Windows 7.
>
> I see no reason to say more or give more detailed list of
> considerations.

Thanks for your comments.  To be honest, I had the impression that Emacs
is still treating the two MinGW flavors as equal.  Having a clear
preference makes thing much easier.

>>  Latest versions of GDB might refuse to load the init file for security
>>  reasons, unless you customize GDB; alternatively, use an explicit
>> -@kbd{source ./gdbinit} command after entering GDB.
>> -} in that directory, to define some extra commands for working with
>> -lisp while debugging, and set up breakpoints to catch abnormal
>> -aborts.
>> +@kbd{source ./gdbinit} command after entering GDB.  } in that
>> +directory, to define some extra commands for working with lisp while
>> +debugging, and set up breakpoints to catch abnormal aborts.
>
> This looks like unnecessary whitespace change, perhaps caused by
> refilling the text?  The newline before the closing "}" of @footnote
> is deliberate and shouldn't be removed, as it makes it easier to
> realize where the footnote ends.

Thanks for catching this, it was indeed caused by refilling.

>> @@ -1645,8 +1679,8 @@ Attachments with Gnus
>>  In your @env{HOME} directory create a file called @file{.mailcap},
>>  with contents like the following:
>>  @example
>> -application/zip "C:/Program Files/7-Zip/7zFM.exe"
>> -video/* "C:/Program Files/VideoLAN/VLC/vlc.exe"
>> +application/zip; "C:/Program Files/7-Zip/7zFM.exe"
>> +video/*; "C:/Program Files/VideoLAN/VLC/vlc.exe"
>>  @end example
>
> Is that semi-colon really necessary?  Did the Gnus syntax change?

My reason for adding them is to catch up with emacs-mime.texi which uses
semi-colon:

@example
image/*; gimp -8 %s
audio/wav; wavplayer %s
application/msword; catdoc %s ; copiousoutput ; nametemplate=%s.doc
@end example

The manuals should be in line.  I can't say it the Gnus syntax changed
somewhere.

>>  Another possibility is Hunspell, which is available from
>>  @uref{https://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/?source=navbar,
>> -the ezwinports site}.
>> +the ezwinports site}.  If you're using the MSYS2 distribution, you can
>> +install a recent version of either GNU Aspell or Hunspell through the
>> +package manager Pacman.  @xref{Other useful ports}.
>
> Is Hunspell offered by MSYS2 a MinGW64 program or an MSYS program?  If
> the latter, we should at least warn people about potential issues with
> I/O incompatibilities.

It is the former: mingw64/mingw-w64-x86_64-hunspell 1.7.0-7.

I'm attaching hopefully the final version.  Once approved, I would
prepare a patch incl. ChangeLog entry.

Attachment: efaq-win32.texi.diff
Description: Text Data

Best, Arash


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]