[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:39:00 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:21:46 +0200
> Cc: 58101@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Thomas Hühn <t@2uo.de>
>
> On 27.09.2022 11:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:00:22 +0200
> >> From: Thomas Hühn <t@2uo.de>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >>
> >> After some googling I found image-scaling-factor, and after setting that
> >> to 1, I always get the expected 1291 . 632 now.
> >
> > So the issue happens because image-scaling-factor is different from 1?
> > If so, this doesn't seem to be a bug, does it?
>
> I cannot reproduce the bug today, but the result until yesterday (as
> written in the bug report) was wrong, even taking image-scaling-factor
> into account (30 . 30).
Well, we need a reproducible recipe to investigate, I think.
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/26
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Stefan Kangas, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/27
- bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical, Thomas Hühn, 2022/09/27