[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Oct 2022 13:37:05 +0200 |
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 13:23:02 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
>>>>> said:
Lars> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>> I never meant that. I meant defining `seq-keep' in terms of `'cl-mapcan',
>> with the appropriate converting elements to lists done for you (or
>> even using `mapcan' if youʼre willing to give up the &rest behaviour
>> of `cl-mapcan')
Lars> Oh, OK. I don't think that would be particularly efficient, though.
Iʼve measured it: itʼs not (even when using mapcan) :-)
Robert
--
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Jonas Bernoulli, 2022/10/03
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/10/03
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/10/04
- bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep,
Robert Pluim <=
bug#58278: Add new function seq-keep, Jonas Bernoulli, 2022/10/04