|
| From: | Phil Sainty |
| Subject: | bug#58423: 29.0.50; Weird behavior of string-edit |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2022 23:40:16 +1300 |
| User-agent: | Orcon Webmail |
On 2022-10-11 13:36, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
That function isn't defined as having any particular return value, so that's as good a value as any.
Is it really, though? How about returning the edited string (or nil if aborted)? Then it would be possible to use `string-edit' as a method of interactively obtaining a string value. Surely that's a useful-and-therefore-better return value (which can then be documented).
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |