bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#58318: 28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with MinGW


From: Andrea Corallo
Subject: bug#58318: 28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with MinGW
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:26:31 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, corwin@bru.st, 58318@debbugs.gnu.org,
>>         bartosz.bubak@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:55:32 +0000
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>> >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, corwin@bru.st, 58318@debbugs.gnu.org,
>> >>         bartosz.bubak@gmail.com
>> >> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:14:43 +0000
>> >> 
>> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> >> make bootstrap on my dev machine (-j16) is ~ 3min 10 secs.
>> >> >
>> >> > I meant the time to build a release tarball, which should be much
>> >> > shorter.  Sorry for being unclear.
>> >> 
>> >> Apologies on my side, I'm not very much into release tarball generation.
>> >> If you specify what's the command you are referring to I can time it and
>> >> report.
>> >
>> > It isn't too important, so feel free to disregard.  But if you have a
>> > few minutes, then unpack the Emacs 28.2 release tarball and build it
>> > with -j16.
>> 
>> Ok,
>> 
>> on my machine is  about 40secs the configure phase and ~1min make -j16.
>
> Thanks, that confirms previous findings: compiling all the trampolines
> takes roughly the same time as building the tarball.

Yes on a sixteen thread machine, with less parallelism trampolines
should be considerably faster then building the tarball.

  Andrea





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]