[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#60060: 29.0.50; tramp-tests leave temporary files behind
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
bug#60060: 29.0.50; tramp-tests leave temporary files behind |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:42:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
Hi Stefan,
>> I've pushed a fix to the emacs-29 branch which should cleanup failing
>> file-local-copy calls. In my environment, /tmp is clean now after
>> running tramp-tests.el.
>>
>> Could you pls recheck?
>
> I've tested using "make -C test tramp-tests". After bootstrap,
> everything is fine, so I'm closing this bug. Thanks.
Thanks for the confirmation.
> BTW, I saw this failure before bootstrap but I'm not sure if it's worth
> fixing:
>
> Test tramp-test47-delay-load condition:
> (ert-test-failed
> ((should
> (string-match-p
> (tramp-compat-rx "Tramp loaded: nil" ... "Tramp loaded: nil" ...
> "Tramp loaded: " ... ...)
> (shell-command-to-string ...)))
> :form
> (string-match-p "Tramp loaded: nil[\n\15]+Tramp loaded:
> nil[\n\15]+Tramp loaded: t[\n\15]+" "Tramp loaded: nil\nTramp loaded:
> nil\nSource file ‘/home/skangas/wip/emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el’
> newer than byte-compiled file; using older file\nSource file
> ‘/home/skangas/wip/emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el’ newer than
> byte-compiled file; using older file\nSource file
> ‘/home/skangas/wip/emacs/lisp/comint.el’ newer than byte-compiled
> file; using older file\nSource file
> ‘/home/skangas/wip/emacs/lisp/cus-edit.el’ newer than byte-compiled
> file; using older file\nTramp loaded: t\n")
> :value nil))
> FAILED 85/88 tramp-test47-delay-load (0.207643 sec) at
> lisp/net/tramp-tests.el:7534
No, it isn't an error. tramp-test47-delay-load checks messages in the
*Messages* buffer. Since your Emacs wan't compiled, there were also
messages like
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Source file ‘/home/skangas/wip/emacs/lisp/comint.el’ newer than byte-compiled
file; using older file
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
which confuse this check.
Best regards, Michael.