[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentati
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:16:54 +0100 |
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:09:50 +0200, Panagiotis Koutsourakis
>>>>> <kutsurak@slartibartfast.net> said:
Panagiotis> The current situation is that the explanation refers to "kbd"
as an easy
Panagiotis> way to write a key binding, but the code example has changed
and makes
Panagiotis> no reference to it.
right
>>
>> How about
>>
>> --begin--
>> There are several syntaxes that can be used to specify the binding,
>> but the simplest and most consistent is the one accepted by
>> @code{kbd}, which is basically a series of characters separated by
>> spaces. Keys with modifiers can be specified by prepending the
>> modifier, such as @samp{C-} for Control, or @samp{M-} for Meta. For
>> example, to bind @samp{C-x} followed by @samp{a}, use
>>
>> @example
>> kbd("C-x a")
>> @end example
>> --end--
Panagiotis> This goes into some detail for a currently deprecated way to
bind keys
Panagiotis> (or at least that's what the current lisp reference manual
says).
Panagiotis> So, to recap:
Panagiotis> 1. I think currently there is a documentation bug: "kbd" is
mentioned in
Panagiotis> text but not used in the example immediately following it.
yes
Panagiotis> 2. Other documentation sources (emacs lisp reference manual in
emacs-29
Panagiotis> branch) explicitly state that the preferred way to bind keys in
emacs 29
Panagiotis> is using "the syntax supported by 'key-valid-p'" and that "[the
old
Panagiotis> functions] should not be used in new code." (section 23.13 of
elisp
Panagiotis> reference in emacs-29)
yes
Panagiotis> So, assuming that we want the documentation as a whole to be
consistent,
Panagiotis> I see two ways forward: either we eliminate or reduce the
importance of
Panagiotis> the old functions in the user manual, or we remove the effective
Panagiotis> deprecation of the old functions in the emacs lisp reference
manual and
Panagiotis> expand on the use of 'kbd', 'global-set-key' and 'define-key'.
Panagiotis> What do you think?
The syntax accepted by the new functions is that of `kbd', so as long
as that syntax is explained somewhere I guess we can remove references
to `kbd' itself.
Robert
--
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Panagiotis Koutsourakis, 2023/01/16
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/16
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Panagiotis Koutsourakis, 2023/01/16
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/16
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Panagiotis Koutsourakis, 2023/01/17
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Robert Pluim, 2023/01/17
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Panagiotis Koutsourakis, 2023/01/17
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/17
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Panagiotis Koutsourakis, 2023/01/17
- bug#60859: [PATCH] Remove reference to the kbd function from documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/21