[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-* |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2023 15:36:44 +0200 |
> From: Manuel Giraud <manuel@ledu-giraud.fr>
> Cc: 61624@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:16:34 +0100
>
> Here is a new version that adresses most of your comments.
LGTM, thanks.
> >> You can delete images through Image-Dired also. Type @kbd{d}
> >> (@code{image-dired-flag-thumb-original-file}) to flag the image file
> >> -for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also delete the thumbnail
> >> +for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also remove the thumbnail
> >> image from the thumbnail buffer with @kbd{C-d}
> >> (@code{image-dired-delete-char}).
> >
> > Not sure I understand the reason for this. "Deletion" goes together
> > with "delete", so why use "remove" instead?
>
> You're right that it goes with "delete" from the command name but I
> thought that "remove" is better because no file is deleted from this
> operation. Only the thumbnail is removed from the thumbnails buffer.
Then I suggest to reword:
Alternatively, you can remove an image's thumbnail from the
thumbnail buffer without flagging the image for deletion, by typing
@kbd{C-d}.
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Manuel Giraud, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Stefan Kangas, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Manuel Giraud, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Stefan Kangas, 2023/02/19