[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61658: 30.0.50; server-eval-at might handle unreadable results bette
|
From: |
Sean Whitton |
|
Subject: |
bug#61658: 30.0.50; server-eval-at might handle unreadable results better |
|
Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2023 11:48:42 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello,
On Thu 09 Mar 2023 at 10:40AM +01, Robert Pluim wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 17:10:51 -0700, Sean Whitton
>>>>>> <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> said:
>
> Sean> Hello,
> Sean> Now implemented. Doesn't seem to me like a NEWS entry is
> warranted, but
> Sean> if anyone strongly disagrees I can write one.
>
> It changes the possible behaviour of a public function, so I think it
> is warranted (and I have some comments on the docstrings, but Iʼll
> address those separately).
But the new condition is a subtype of the old one, so it's a fully
backwards-compatible change to the behaviour. Indeed, barely a change.
Does anyone else have any intuitions about this?
--
Sean Whitton