bug#62158: treesit-end-of-defun error

[Juri Linkov]

X-Debbugs-Cc: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>

Since this is a separate problem, I'm closing bug#62086
and opening a new bug report:

>>>> I don't know if the second bug is related to this, but while
>>>> in the same file, also type 'C-M-l' ('reposition-window').
>>>> It raises the error:
>>>>   Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p 
>>>> nil)
>>>>     treesit-end-of-defun()
>>>>     end-of-defun(-1)
>>>>     reposition-window(nil nil)
>>>>     reposition-window(nil 89)
>>>>     funcall-interactively(reposition-window nil 89)
>>>>     command-execute(reposition-window)
>> I see it only in some files in test/lisp/progmodes/ruby-mode-resources/
>> e.g. ruby-parenless-call-arguments-indent.rb, ruby-method-call-indent.rb,
>> ruby-block-indent.rb.  But not in e.g. ruby-after-operator-indent.rb.
>> Also everywhere in 
>> test/lisp/progmodes/js-resources/js-indent-init-dynamic.js,
>> js-indent-init-t.js.  But not in e.g. js-chain.js.
>
> Thanks, I can repro. I might have been trying the wrong binding at the end
> last night (C-l instead of C-M-l).
>
> The fix seems to be easy:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/treesit.el b/lisp/treesit.el
> index c118f5d52a4..b271a1f0c4b 100644
> --- a/lisp/treesit.el
> +++ b/lisp/treesit.el
> @@ -1882,6 +1882,7 @@ treesit-end-of-defun
>  `treesit-defun-skipper'."
>    (interactive "^p\nd")
>    (let ((orig-point (point)))
> +    (if (or (null arg) (= arg 0)) (setq arg 1))
>      (catch 'done
>        (dotimes (_ 2) ; Not making progress is better than infloop.
>
> But I'm not quite sure if that is what we want to do.
>
> More naturally, I think, would be to remove the argument from
> treesit-end-of-defun altogether (and adjust the code accordingly), because
> end-of-defun-function is documented to take no arguments.
>
> The only other place where treesit-end-of-defun seems to be used is the
> <remap> <end-of-defun> binding set up by treesit-major-mode-setup.
>
> Why not keep the default bindings for these? When
> beginning-of-defun-function and end-of-defun-function are set
> appropriately, they should work fine. Don't they?
>
> Cc'ing Yuan on that subject.