[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64077: 30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in calc.texi [PAT
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#64077: 30.0.50; Wrong definition of gamma function in calc.texi [PATCH] |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:01:25 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, lockywolf@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:54:26 +0200
>
> On Jun 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Thanks, fixed. (But the corresponding @infoline needed to be fixed as
> > well, right? So I did that. And switched to using @sup there, to
> > produce a nicer HTML output.)
>
> Using @sup{..} is wrong here, though. The @infoline line is using calc
> algebraic syntax.
I don't see how that follows. Those look like function definitions to
me, and they are not inside @kbd (which would indicate something the
user should type into Calc).
So I don't think @sup is wrong there.