[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66867: lexical binding?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
bug#66867: lexical binding? |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Nov 2023 02:15:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Greg Minshall <minshall@umich.edu> writes:
> hi. maybe this has something to do with not having lexical binding
> enabled (when the =(eval)= is being done)?
Yes, creating oclosures requires lexical-binding, and this is not
directly enforced in the code. Your backtrace looks like if the code
was interpreted using the dynamically binding dialect.
--eval uses lexical-binding since Emacs 27.1.
Michael.
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/01
- bug#66867: lexical binding?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/03
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#66867: closed (Re: bug#66867: lexical binding?), Greg Minshall, 2023/11/06