[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66867: lexical binding?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#66867: lexical binding? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:39:15 -0700 |
severity 66867 wishlist
tags 66867 + confirmed
thanks
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> maybe the Oclosure code should enforce lexical-binding, if it can, or
>>> throw an informative error in the case it can't so enforce?
>> Stefan M, what do you think?
>
> A (cl-assert lexical-binding) in something like `oclosure--lambda`
> sounds good, yes.
Thanks, so patches welcome.
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/01
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/01
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?,
Stefan Kangas <=
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/03
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#66867: closed (Re: bug#66867: lexical binding?), Greg Minshall, 2023/11/06