[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66863: [PATCH] Add two docstrings in cl-macs.el
From: |
Jeremy Bryant |
Subject: |
bug#66863: [PATCH] Add two docstrings in cl-macs.el |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Nov 2023 09:23:42 +0000 |
Thank you, I've made a note on conventions. For this patch, as you have
pushed, does this mean this is closed?
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> From 16298965905b1859aa8a342b98803f4abd6da3f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@jeremybryant.net>
>> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 23:37:10 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add two docstrings in cl-macs.el
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
>> (defun cl--simple-exprs-p (xs)
>> + "Map `cl--simple-expr-p' to each element of list XS."
>
> This doesn't say how the results of `cl--simple-expr-p` are combined,
> it might even suggest they're returned as a list.
> I think I would have said something like
>
> "Like `cl--simple-expr-p' but for a list of expressions."
>
>> (defun cl--const-expr-p (x)
>> + "Check if X is constant (i.e., no side effects or dependencies).
>> +
>> +See `macroexp-const-p' for similar functionality without cl-lib dependency."
>
> "Similar" fails to describe the difference :-(
> [ Note, I can't blame you: I know the difference but I couldn't come up
> with a useful description of it, that is, one that is easier to
> understand than the code itself. FWIW I believe the difference is
> a latent bug, which is partly why I'd like to delete the function :-) ]
>
>
> Stefan