[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist` |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:00:40 +0100 |
> BTW, I just noticed another way to attack the problem, which is to add
> a `pop-up-frames` argument which works just like the variable but takes
> precedence over it, as in the PoC patch below (a real patch would
> adjust other places where we use that variable, among other things).
>
> WDYT?
Then we should probably use 'pop-up-windows' instead of
'inhibit-same-window'. 'display-buffer' resembles a Cervantesque
struggle of consistency with history.
martin
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, (continued)
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/20
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, martin rudalics, 2023/11/21
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/21
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, martin rudalics, 2023/11/22
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/22
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, martin rudalics, 2023/11/23
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/23
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, martin rudalics, 2023/11/24
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/24
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/24
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/25
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, martin rudalics, 2023/11/25
- bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/25