bug#67070: 29.1; broken keybindings with emacs 29

[Eli Zaretskii]

Ping!  Can we please make some further progress with this issue?

> From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
> Cc: Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>         67070@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:33:52 +0100
> 
> Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de> writes:
> 
> >> What if you assign Super_L to a modifier bit just for testing?
> >
> > After an additional
> >
> > | add Mod3 = Super_L Super_R
> >
> > emacs reports 'H-M-x is undefined' on 'Meta_L (0x40) + x'.
> 
> Doing
> 
> | add Mod3 = Super_L Super_R Hyper_R Hyper_L
> 
> generates the expected 'M-x'
> 
> 
> 
> The Super or Hyper keys are probably coming from
> 
> $ setxkbmap
> $ xkbcomp :0 - | grep Mod4
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <LWIN> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <RWIN> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <SUPR> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <HYPR> };
> 
> $ xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap
> $ xkbcomp :0 - | grep Mod4
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <LALT> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <RALT> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <RWIN> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <META> };
> 
>   --> bad 'M-s-x' or 'H-M-x'
> 
> $ xkbcomp :0 - | xkbcomp - :0
> $ xkbcomp :0 - | grep Mod4
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <LALT> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <RALT> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <RWIN> };
>     modifier_map Mod4 { <META> };
> 
>   --> expected 'M-x'
> 
> 
> 
> Enrico
>