bug-gnuastro
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possibly wrong message is reported when a FITS image has only one HD


From: Mohammad Akhlaghi
Subject: Re: Possibly wrong message is reported when a FITS image has only one HDU.
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 02:57:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0

Thanks a lot for bringing this to our attention.

I just defined bug #58363 [1], so we don't forget to precisely cite the part of the standard that encourages/recommends this. I cited a few parts of the FITS 4.0 standard about having metadata about the whole file in the primary HDU, but I'll have to find the exact part later ;-).

Generally, the point of the error message is not to say that the file is faulty. It just means to say something like this: "your data is on the primary HDU, so please run your command again with '--hdu=0', or '-h0', by default Gnuastro programs have '--hdu=1' or '-h1'.".

I just updated the description so it hopefully conveys this meaning and is less confusing:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuastro.git/commit/?id=61e44ed139

If you like you can get the latest Gnuastro version (with this commit implemented, currently version 0.11.60, or 60 commits after version 0.11) from this link:

https://akhlaghi.org/gnuastro-latest.tar.lz
(I will shortly release version 0.12)

Thanks again for raising all these great points :-).

Cheers,
Mohammad

[1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58363

On 5/12/20 9:26 PM, rmorales wrote:
Summary:
Possibly wrong message is reported when a FITS image has only one HDU.

gnuastro version:
0.11

test image set:
https://cloud.iaa.csic.es/public.php?service=files&t=9344cdb85c640c7dd74446d8c266591d

command:
aststatistics 019_00.fits

result :
‘019_00.fits’ has only one extension/HDU but you have asked for the second HDU (hdu number 1 in CFITSIO) ....
Gnuastro leaves the first HDU blank (with no data) and writes the outputs in the second HDU.
...
This is the recommended way in the FITS standard.
...

question:
Maybe I’m wrong, but I did not find any recommendation in the last FITS standard to organize the FITS file in that way.

FITS standard: Version 4.0 (13 August 2018)
https://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/standard40/fits_standard40aa-le.pdf
Section 3. FITS file organization

Using fitsverify also does not report any error or warning on the same file.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]