[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2
From: |
Douglas Zare |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2 |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:05:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
> How about 1 closed out, extras on the 23, 10, and 7, versus 13 off with a
> blot on the 1?
In 90,000 trials, Snowie 3 1-ply wins 15.5% (-0.691 +-0.004).
In 9,000 trials, Snowie 3 2-ply wins 17.3% (-0.655 +-0.004). That's 2-ply huge.
I'm running a 3-ply (huge 33%) rollout now, but if the spares get to good
places, 3-ply wins more than 21% of the time, if I remember correctly. I doubt
3-ply will bear in well here, though, and so far it looks like 3-ply will win
about 19%. I'm not sure if the position ought to be a take; my guess is no, but
that it is close. Snowie evaluations switch the equities of 13 off and 12 off,
so the variance reduction isn't great.
I'll post some Snowie 4 rollouts later.
Douglas Zare
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/24
- variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/24
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], nis, 2002/10/28
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/28
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], nis, 2002/10/29
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], Douglas Zare, 2002/10/28
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/24
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/25
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Douglas Zare, 2002/10/25
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2,
Douglas Zare <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Douglas Zare, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Morten Wang, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Morten Wang, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Morten Wang, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/29