bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] My Ideas for move filters


From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] My Ideas for move filters
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:27:18 +1300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202

Again, I think the move filters is not applicable to analyze, and I am not sure about hint.

-Joseph

Joern Thyssen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, address@hidden wrote

Notice in the moves limit I have only mentioned a single number instead of always accept x moves and add extra. I think you should have the option to set always accept to 0 as there isn't much point evaluating a minimum number of moves if the top play at the previous ply is way ahead of the second choice.


Perhaps not for gnubg finding it's best move, but for analysis or hint
it might be nice to see a least two moves evaluating on the given
setting.

So that calls for two sets of predefined filters: one for playing and
one for analysis/hint?!

However, maybe you're right: we could add 0 as an acceptable value for
"accept"? (implementation: use "-1" to signal a disabled movefilter).

Jørn


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]