bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Naw..panic or teach me what I am doing wrong !!


From: Nardy Pillards
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Naw..panic or teach me what I am doing wrong !!
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:27:25 +0100

From: "Joseph Heled" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:29 AM
>
> Fix has been submitted. I hope Nardy or Oystein can build a new windows
> version soon so you can all test it. I think it will turn out that GNUbg
> at 2ply plays this better than SN 4, but I can be wrong.
>
> -Joseph

I uploaded that build  at 5 am (my morning).
changelog 1.928, rollout.c 1.95
Nardy

> Joern Thyssen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:44:02AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote
> >
> >>but now it gives me strange results. The difference seems to be when
> >>using (or not using) the truncation. Can you try those 2
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>I get wildly different results. Perhaps the evaluation somewhere else is
> >>  wrong?
> >
> >
> > Try inverting the equivalent test in the bearoff truncation evaluations
> > -- it's just an unfounded guess!
> >
> > Jørn
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bug-gnubg mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]