|
From: | Joseph Heled |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Cubeless Rollout Bug In New Build (Now fixed! ) |
Date: | Sat, 11 Jan 2003 09:52:32 +1300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 |
And one more thing. Would you be thinking the same about Snowie if it turned out that SN rollouts were better? :)
-Joseph Joseph Heled wrote:
Moore, Dave wrote:This is a pretty promising result! Just to play Devil's advocate, though, isn't it possible that this shows that GnuBG is perhaps worse at defending against a backgame while being equally good at playing a backgame?Neil choose this position because he thinks it represents a skill test for the backgame player only. I think this is mostly true. Some of us have looked at games played and I think no one saw big errors on the trapped side.Only a "multi bot" rollout will settle the issue, but it is a long time until SN becomes open source :)-JosephThanks, Dave-----Original Message----- *From:* address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2003 9:23 AM *To:* address@hidden *Subject:* [Bug-gnubg] Re: Cubeless Rollout Bug In New Build (Now fixed!) Hi Just downloaded the new build from Nardy's site and checked the backgame position I sent you (137.sgf) that I was testing all the bots with. Here are the results at 0-ply. (32000 trials) Hey GNU is strongest!! JF 0-Ply -0.672 40.2/0.9/0.0---59.8/35.0/13.6 SW3.2 0-Ply -0.669 40.4/1.0/0.0---59.6/35.7/13.0 SW4 0-Ply -0.636 42.1/1.0/0.0---57.9/35.7/13.1 GNU 0-Ply -0.582 43.5/0.9/0.0---56.4/34.7/11.5 I'm testing this position at higher plies now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |