[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg release schedule
From: |
Gary Wong |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg release schedule |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:21:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:40:25AM +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> I think you proprosal with a "stable" branch is fine. Although it'll
> probably give some extra work for the builders: most users will most
> likely want to run on the "stable" branch, but I'm sure that there are
> someone out there who wants the new features X and Y, and just can't
> wait for 0.14.0 "stable" :-)
>
> How do we handle the transition from 0.13.x "stable" to 0.14.0
> "stable"? Do we have a feature freeze, say, 2 weeks before the
> scheduled 0.14.0 release? Or do we just make a 0.14.0 (and *don't*
> call it stable yet!), and wait for it to stabilise?
Hrmmm... not sure, but I lean towards the latter. (It would be a
shame to freeze the trunk at this point, I think.)
We could either release a 0.x.0 tarball and label it "unstable", or
create the 0.x CVS branch and listen for bug reports on the CVS code
and/or binary snapshots until we think the 0.x branch is ready to be
called stable.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary Wong address@hidden http://www.cs.arizona.edu/~gary/