[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Market window reports
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Market window reports |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:57:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:39:13PM -0000, ershaw wrote
> GNU Backgammon Position ID: xm7gAwjmdsADBA
> Match ID : cIl1AAAAAAAA
> +24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+ O: Opponent
> | O X O O | | O X | 0 points
> | O O O | | O X |
> | O | | X |
> | | | X |
> | | | |
> | |BAR| |v 3 point match (Cube: 1)
> | | | O |
> | | | O |
> | X X | | O |
> | X X X X | | O | Rolled 35
> | X O X X X | | O | 0 points
> +-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+ X: ian
>
>
>
> The market window table reports my Too Good Point as 68.612%. (There is no
> Copy function on this window, BTW)
> The 2-ply cube analysis reports the proper cube action as Double/Pass, even
> though I am over the Too Good point. This seems inconsistent to me.
>
> Cube analysis
> 2-ply cubeless equity +0.742 (Money: +0.630)
> 0.705 0.288 0.004 - 0.295 0.069 0.003
> 1. Double, pass +1.000
> 2. Double, take +1.292 ( +0.292)
> 3. No double +0.857 ( -0.143)
> Proper cube action: Double, pass
First, gnubg uses a 0-ply evaluation for the market window. Second, the
68.6% you report is for a fully live cube, whereas the too good point is
82.758% for a dead cube.
0-ply reports:
Win W(g) W(bg) L(g) L(bg) Mwc
0.692 0.282 0.003 0.072 0.002 57.01%
Double, pass : 60.00%
Double, take : 61.85% ( +1.85%)
No double : 59.12% ( -0.88%)
Correct cube action: Double, pass
Since 69.2% > 68.6% you're in the good too window. Now, gnubg
extrapolates your mwc between (68.6%,60%) (you cash one point) and
(100%,66.22%) (you win the game with the current gammon ratios).
WIth p = 69.2% you get: 60.11% which is your equity with a fully live
cube.
Your dead cube equity is 57.01%.
Your final equity is: 0.32 * 57.01% + 0.68 * 60.11 = 59.12% which is
what gnubg reports above as the equity for not doubling.
As 59.12% is lower than the equity for doubling the position is a
double.
Of course, 2-ply is more complicated since it's an average over many
positions and cube values and ownerships.
Jørn