RE: [Bug-gnubg] weights 0.14

[Albert Silver]

Ok, cool. Thanks for setting my mind at ease. :-)

                                Albert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:bug-gnubg-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Mueller, Achim
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:34 PM
> To: Albert Silver
> Cc: 'GNUBackgammon; 'Nardy Pillards'; reporting'
> Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] weights 0.14
> 
> Am Mit, 2003-06-11 um 16.58 schrieb Albert Silver:
> > Just one question: I compared the sizes of 0.13b and 0.14 and they
are
> > exactly the same size. The dates are different, but the number of
bytes
> > is identical. Is that correct?
> 
> Here they are different:
> 
> 1014892 2003-05-23 16:30 gnubg.weights-0.13b
> 1018749 2003-06-11 18:27 gnubg.weights.14
> 
> And here is the md5sum:
> 
> 00d408dfbb6120593877f99d3c881a8b  gnubg.weights-0.13b
> 8c062b11bb15d8f6b00cf76369954ad0  gnubg.weights.14
> 
> Ciao
> 
> Achim
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
> disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
> http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg