[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug tracker: Forwarding of postings
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug tracker: Forwarding of postings |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:32:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:06:45PM +0200, Holger wrote
> At 20:22 26.06.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:02:16PM +0200, Holger wrote
> >> At 19:03 26.06.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >> >I've disabled the forward to the list for now.
> >>
> >> OK. Does it actually work better with your address, or is it the same?
> >
> >It depends what you mean by better :-) The report is the same ugly
> >format, but I do get all mails.
>
> Firstly, I was wondering whether it is in any way different, although I
> didn't really suppose it to be. What should be so special about your
> address over the list's?
The list may filter certain mails, e.g., to exclude malconfigured
auto-reponses from people on vacation etc.
I noticed the following header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=4.0
meaning that some spam filter rates this mails as being very close to
spam.
> Yes, I've seen this. There should probably be an option (check box) in the
> administration whether to forward a particular update or not.
Yes, it's possible to control this for the different "roles", e.g., do
not forward to CC persons when, say, the bug is closed. For the global
email notification, you only have the option "send on all updates".
Jørn