[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] Re: FIBS rating and error rates
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] Re: FIBS rating and error rates |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:08:32 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi,
I recently completed another series of simulations in order to determine
the relation between error rates and FIBS rating. The new simulations
resulted in a much improved formula, using a bilinear fit to move error
and cube error separately.
The results are summarized on http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~kvdoel/tmp/ratings,
and I'd appreciate it if anyone could have a critical look, making sure
I didn't mess up anywhere.
Bottom line is the following formula for the rating difference:
R = a2(N)*EPM+b(N)*EPC,
where
a2(N) = 8798 + 2526/N,
and
b(N) = 863 - 519/N.
Kees
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Ned Cross, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, kvandoel, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, kvandoel, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, kvandoel, 2003/08/30
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, Holger, 2003/08/30
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] panel Windows bug, kvandoel, 2003/08/30
[Bug-gnubg] Re: FIBS rating and error rates,
kvandoel <=
Re: [Bug-gnubg] FIBS rating and error rates, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/22
Re: [Bug-gnubg] FIBS rating and error rates, kvandoel, 2003/08/22