Re: [Bug-gnubg] FTGL

[Jon Kinsey]

I've managed to get things to go wrong with mingw here (no numbers on
the cube and the point numbers are spaced incorrectly).  I'll take a
look at this over the weekend.

If you've got time try building the ftgldemo program, this should give
you an idea if ftgl is working at all.

Jon

Eli Dayan wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to use 2.1.2 on Solaris 10 with Sun compilers.  FTGL itself 
> builds fine with no problems (aside from the fact that there seems to be 
> missing an 'uninstall' target in the makefile), however the code in gnubg 
> which is using FTGL does not build properly, and I must force gnubg to use 
> GLUT instead.  Why performance is still so poor on Solaris is a mystery to 
> me, however, if someone would like to assist me in getting the FTGL code 
> going on Solaris, I would certainly appreciate it.  I have already resolved a 
> few other probelms preventing a proper build on Solaris, and FTGL issues seem 
> to be the last hurdle.  According to this page: 
> http://opengl.geek.nz/weblog/archives/000092.html, it does not seem that FTGL 
> has much life left.
> 
> Eli Dayan
> 
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 04:58, Joseph Heled wrote:
> 
>>I am using 2.1.2-1 on Kubuntu, Linux, and it does not work well.
>>
>>-Joseph
>>
>>On 9/14/05, Jon Kinsey <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>I've just tried building gnubg with the latest version of ftgl (2.1.2
>>>dec 2004) and the cube/other numbers display fine.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
> 
>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature