[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Réf . : [Bug-gnubg] Suggestion for change of rates/ratings
From: |
Christian Anthon |
Subject: |
Re: Réf . : [Bug-gnubg] Suggestion for change of rates/ratings |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:42:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.10i |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:01:09PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >it is well known that gnubg judges the players harder than snowie.
> >Snowie error rates seems to be defacto standard when judging players. To
> >see how gnubg and snowie error rates compare I tried downloading 25 or
> >so matches from Hardye's site, all played between more or less world
> >class players and most of them quite long. They were analysed using
> >gnubg 2ply/2ply.
> >
> >To summarise:
> >
> >snowie_m snowie_c snowie gnubg_m gnubg_c gnubg
> > 3.91 1.66 5.58 9.36 21.51 11.25
>
> What are snowie_m snowie_c snowie gnubg_m gnubg_c gnubg ?!
>
sorry, thought this would be clear. All error rates, computed the snowie
way first, and the gnubg way second. (m)oves, (c)ube and total.
> In match stats there's a "Equiv. Snowie error rate", so why not adding an
> "Equiv. Snowie overall rating" based on the "Equiv. Snowie error rate"
> (using same grouping as Snowie) ?
Because there is more than enough info in the stats already and I more
or less now the translation.
>
> This would be Snowie-like without changing gnubg rating system ...
>
I am not looking to change the system , just the rate->rating
translations.
Christian.