RE: [Bug-gnubg] window size

[Ian Shaw]

Christian Anthon wrote on 03 May 2006 09:49

> 
> Agreed, but this is besides my point. Do you still think we 
> need the evaluate window?
> 

The eval window is poor and should go. However, there is still info that
should be retained somewhere.

I have made my comments about epc and wastage.
Rob's comments about the bearoff distribution are valid. We should keep
that info.

I would suggest combining it into a race analysis window. This would
show the epc and wastage, with an indication about whether it is from a
rollotu or database. The bearoff breakdown should follow.

The only other data is for neural net outputs. It is really only useful
to someone doing training (although it is sometimes good to be able to
see 0,1, and 2-ply evals at the same time.)

Joseph is the only person experienced in training, and he doesn't even
use gnubg itself for the job.  I have vague fantasies about embarking on
a next stage of training. That data might be invaluable then, but Idon't
really know. Perhaps Joseph should comment.

Perhaps it should be downgraded to the Options...Training tab, or
removed from the gui like the database generation appears to be. If
you're doing this, the same fate should probably befall the
Options...Training tab itself.

Whilst on the Analyse Menu, Analyse Match & Analyse Session have the
same function, so should be combined.

-- Ian