Re: [Bug-gnubg] Default met

[Achim Mueller]

* Joseph Heled <address@hidden> [070704 09:59]:
> On 7/4/07, Achim Mueller <address@hidden> wrote:

> >Didn't you also make a _very_ long simulation comparing mets?
> 
> Yes, but I played each set of dice rolls twice, identical rolls but
> swapped. This handles the variance better, and I could not find a
> large difference if I recall correctly.

I made a printout of doubling windows for the different equity tables.
Just a few examples:


                Snowie       Zadeh
n3 - n2   (1)  57,7 - 73,0  55,3 - 71,7
n3 - n4   (1)  37,8 - 62,5  41,5 - 65,9   !!
n4 - n2   (1)  65,8 - 81,2  63,3 - 79,4   !!
n4 - n4   (1)  50,0 - 72,0  50,0 - 70,9
n4 - n4   (2)  50,0 - 66,4  50,0 - 67,7     

The results of gnubg matches against itself with different mets must
somehow reflect these differences.

I'll check whether I can do a longer simulation of gnubg(g11) -
gnubg(zadeh) here at work. Do you still have the framework of your
rollouts?

Ciao

Achim