[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Somewhat outdated GPL license notices
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Somewhat outdated GPL license notices |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:20:10 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 21/07/2013 7:59 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "either version 3 or later of the License, or (at your
> option) any later version,"
I agree that source files without a GPL header should have them added. I
haven't counted how many fall into this category. I (and other
developers) can fix this when time permits. As for the unusual wording
above, I couldn't even find it in any of the GPLv3's drafts so not sure
how it made it into the code base. It should read:
"either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version."
--
Michael Petch
GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer
OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304