[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current development
From: |
Philippe Michel |
Subject: |
Re: current development |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2019 00:42:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) |
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:53:44AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
> Perhaps the GNUBG code can be structured in a way that it can be
> compiled with all those "advance features", yet they are used *only*
> in rollouts and so everything else works on older systems?
>
> Is that possible or am I just showing my ignorance?
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:42, Russ Allbery <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Trying to build the binary multiple times with different compiler flags
> > and select an appropriate version for the local CPU at runtime was more
> > work than I had time or energy to do, and felt like overkill.
Reasonably recent versions of gcc and clang have a feature (ifuncs) that
should allow to to this in one single binary. I don't know how onerous
it would be at package building stage, but I think a few parts of Linux,
for instance glibc, use that feature, so at least it wouldn't be unknown
territory.
- Re: current development, (continued)
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Russ Allbery, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Russ Allbery, 2019/12/03
- Message not available
- Fwd: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development,
Philippe Michel <=
- Re: current development, Russ Allbery, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Philippe Michel, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Philippe Michel, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Russ Allbery, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Superfly Jon, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04