[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current development
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: current development |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:19:23 +0000 |
Hi Joseph,
> I thought so.
>
> I had the same idea the day I heard they cracked go, but just saying
> something is a good idea is not helpful at all in my book.
I think you're wrong. And also a bit rude to boot.
It's fine for Tim to suggest or ponder an idea to the list. It may
encourage another subscriber, or draw out news of what a lurker has been
working on that's related.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: current development, (continued)
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
Re: current development, Timothy Y. Chow, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/03
- Re: current development, Timothy Y. Chow, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Ingo Macherius, 2019/12/04
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
Re: current development, Øystein Schønning-Johansen, 2019/12/04
Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
Message not availableRe: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04
Re: current development, Timothy Y. Chow, 2019/12/04
Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2019/12/04