Re: [Bug-gnulib] safe-read.[ch] (safe_read): what do you think?

[Bruno Haible]

Jim Meyering writes:

> FYI, I've just checked in this change to restore
> the old (coreutils) behavior:
> 
>       * safe-read.c (EINTR): Define.
>       (safe_read): Rewrite to iterate IFF the read fails with EINTR.
> 
> because the previous version didn't work as used by cat.

Thanks. I had put in the EOF handling into full-read.c but forgot it
in safe-read.c :-(.

I've applied your changes to safe-write.[hc] also, but removed the
suspicious definition of EINTR: if EINTR is not defined a "while (0)"
is sufficient.

Bruno