bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnulib] safe-read.[ch] (safe_read): what do you think?


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnulib] safe-read.[ch] (safe_read): what do you think?
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:14:35 +0100 (CET)

Jim Meyering writes:
> I try hard to avoid adding cpp directives to the body
> of a function.  And I try even harder to avoid it when such an
> addition would be solely in support of deficient systems.

And I try hard to not let one system execute some useless code just
because another system needs it.

The IS_EINTR is fine with me; the compiler optimizes it away on those
platforms where it would be useless.

Bruno




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]