Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp()

[Jim Meyering]

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
>> With m4/argp.m4 I see two problems:
>>
>>   - The module doesn't define a function argp(), therefore _FUNC_ARGP is
>>     inappropriate. Can you call the macro AC_ARGP or gl_ARGP ?
>
> I used AC_ARGP below.  Is there a policy about the gl_ prefix?  I
> found it slightly ugly, and it doesn't seem to be used consistently.

Please don't use the AC_ prefix.  It's reserved for macros
that are part of autoconf.
I'm guilty of making that mistake for many macros in gnulib/m4,
and do plan to rename them to have the gl_ prefix.