[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case |
Date: |
09 Sep 2003 13:37:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:
> Twin Sun decommissioned its last SunOS 4.x host in
> August 2000, and nobody I know at UCLA has one.
>
> Does *anyone* still have SunOS 4? Maybe it's time not to care about it
> at all?
It's a close call. I know that the Perl hackers have been adding
SunOS 4 fixes recently (i.e., last month), and likewise for OpenSSL
(June), but I don't know who's using the results. On the other hand,
the MIT Kerberos Team dropped support for SunOS 4 recently (for
example, they now do free (NULL) without worrying about it.)
The last-ship date for Solaris 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 (both based on SunOS 4)
was 1998-09-30. Sun still supports it until the end of this month.
(Maybe that's why Bill Joy is leaving Sun now? :-)
SunOS 4 is getting a bit long in the tooth, but I think enough people
still use it actively that I'd rather wait a couple of years more.
(Besides, I'm getting burned out installing all these trivial changes....)
- [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Bruno Haible, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, James Youngman, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, James Youngman, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/10