Re: [Bug-gnulib] Patch proposal: 1-gary-safe-xfree.patch

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> > I thought about it a bit more, and decided that it'd be better to use
> > a solution that simply causes 'free' to work as expected in C89 or
> > letter.  We shouldn't introduce yet another symbol like 'xfree'; we
> > should just make 'free' work.
>
>
> Fully agreed. That's a good general guideline.

Shall I apply what we have so far to help us reach a concensus?

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan    gary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker         http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author       http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/