[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch]
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch] |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:51:16 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:
> The question is what horrible differences are
> there between lib/regex.[ch] and glibc's regex.[ch], and do both need to
> exist. Last time I looked (quite a while ago), it didn't seem like the
> differences were that pronounced.
The glibc regex was rewritten nearly from scratch on 2002-02-26, with
a new implementation contributed by Isamu Hasegawa. Have you checked
since then?
- [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Oskar Liljeblad, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Bruno Haible, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Oskar Liljeblad, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Karl Berry, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Paul Eggert, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Jeff Bailey, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Paul Eggert, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Karl Berry, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Paul Eggert, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch], Karl Berry, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] removal of regex.[ch],
Paul Eggert <=