[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:04:45 -0400 |
[ask rms]
Does seem (to me) like that should be the next move. Will you write him?
If rms agrees that your libraries should be LGPL'd, then perhaps he
would not object to everything in gnulib being dual-licensed, since the
whole purpose of gnulib is to be shared among all GNU packages.
- [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/22
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/22
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/22
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/23
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/23
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Paul Eggert, 2004/09/24
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/26