[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:48:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> For the m4 files, I propose to add the standard notice to them:
>
> dnl Copyright (C) YEARS Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> dnl This file is free software, distributed under the terms of the GNU
> dnl General Public License. As a special exception to the GNU General
> dnl Public License, this file may be distributed as part of a program
> dnl that contains a configuration script generated by Autoconf, under
> dnl the same distribution terms as the rest of that program.
For GPL'ed modules, I'd rather just use the GPL, as it's simpler and
clearer. I don't see the point of having a special exception for the
m4 files if the underlying code is GPLed.
For LGPL'ed modules the situation is a bit murkier, and the above
notice would be fine with me.
Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Robert Millan, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/07
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] missing licenses in gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/07