[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug? |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Oct 2004 16:52:53 +0200 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
...
>> Here's a proposed solution: Apply the following patch. Then
>> applications (coreutils?) that want the optimized getline version can
>> put AC_DEFINE(USE_UNLOCKED_IO, 1) in their configure.ac.
>
> This sort of thing should be done systematically, if it is done
> at all. I'd like Jim Meyering's opinion on it first, since he
> contributed the unlocked-io stuff.
Simon's solution (of changing the default to be `don't use unlocked-io')
is fine with me. Until now, the only users of this module have been
single-threaded applications.
- [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/03
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/03
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/04
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, P, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, P, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] getpass problem (was: Re: getline bug?), Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/12