[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug? |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:50:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> wouldn't it be better simply to
> remove the linebuffer module and rewrite all its invokers to use
> getline? I don't see the point of the linebuffer module
The linebuffer module is an object-oriented line buffering code;
getline serves a similar purpose but is written in functional style.
getline is more flexible; OTOH, linebuffer is easier to use. I consider
line-buffer to be higher-level than getline.
Both have its respective value.
Bruno
- [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/03
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/03
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Jim Meyering, 2004/10/03
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/04
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, P, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, P, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] getpass problem (was: Re: getline bug?), Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/12
[Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Jim Meyering, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/06