[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check_version
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: check_version |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:02:46 +0200 |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Not sure I follow the higher-level language part... Perhaps I should
> explain more what I use this for.
>
> I use it in my libraries, which are all written in C. The source code
Thanks for explaining.
That's what I suspected.
What do you think about putting a description like this
in the module itself? Then potential users of the
module won't have to go find uses of it in other packages
to understand how it can be useful.
- check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/25
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/25
- Re: check_version, Jim Meyering, 2005/06/25
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/25
- Re: check_version, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/26
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/27
- Re: check_version, Jim Meyering, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Jim Meyering, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Derek Price, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Simon Josefsson, 2005/06/28
- Re: check_version, Derek Price, 2005/06/28