[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:49:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:34:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> 2005-08-09 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>
> * fts-cycle.c (setup_dir, enter_dir, leave_dir, free_dir):
> Use the hash-table-based cycle-detection code not just when
> FTS_TIGHT_CYCLE_CHECK if specified, but also with FTS_LOGICAL.
> Reported by James Youngman
This patch resolves my problem; thanks. Might I suggest though that
you enhance the ChangeLog entry to describe the problem as well as the
solution?
Thanks,
James.
- Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, James Youngman, 2005/08/08
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/09
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts,
James Youngman <=
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/10
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/14
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Eric Blake, 2005/08/23
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/24