Re: Bug Report: sed-4.1.4 misinterprets uClibc's malloc (patch included)

[Paul Eggert]

Yuri Vasilevski <address@hidden> writes:

> Also glibc's realloc return NULL if size == 0, so in the places where
> realloc is used in regex the case of NULL pointers most be taken care
> off in any way.

I just checked, and regex never uses size == 0 with realloc, so we're
OK there.  (This assuming no arithmetic overflow, but the regex code
is riddled with overflow gotchas and I'd rather address that problem
separately.)