Re: canon-host errors

[Derek Price]

Jim Meyering wrote:

>I like your idea of keeping them separate.
>How about passing either NULL or the address of a struct
>containing a member for each error indicator?
>  
>

Okay.  Will do.  Should I ignore single-threaded apps entirely, keep the
error data in a global to simplify for single-threaded apps on NULL, or
break the functions into canon_host, canon_host_r, strcherror, &
strcherror_r?

Regards,

Derek

-- 
Derek R. Price
CVS Solutions Architect
Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>
v: +1 717.579.6168
f: +1 717.234.3125
<mailto:address@hidden>