[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: des
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: des |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:03:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:55:32PM CEST:
> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:23:25PM CEST:
> > +/*
> > + * Table with weak DES keys sorted in ascending order.
> > + * In DES their are 64 known keys wich are weak. They are weak
>
> s/their/there/
and of course s/wich/which/. D'oh.
> > + * because they produce only one, two or four different
> > + * subkeys in the subkey scheduling process.
> > + * The keys in this table have all their parity bits cleared.
> > + */
- des, Simon Josefsson, 2005/10/14
- Re: des, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/14
- Re: des,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: des, Simon Josefsson, 2005/10/14