[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: style question - const char *
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: style question - const char * |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:25:08 +0100 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Is there a preference for 'const char *' over 'char const *'?
>
> I prefer putting type qualifiers like "const" after the types they
> modify, as that's more consistent. For example, "char * const *" puts
As you've probably noticed, I too prefer that.
For the same reason: syntactic consistency.