[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of program_name
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: use of program_name |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2006 03:14:29 EET |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> > -# define program_name program_invocation_name
>
> Let's omit this '#define', and change all uses of program_name to
> program_name in the rest of the code. The other arm of the #if can
> then contain
>
> #define program_invocation_name program_name ()
No, it cannot. First of all, error.c does not use this symbol, so there
is no use defining it. And, secondly, gnulib module argp makes sure
program_invocation_name (and its counterpart program_invocation_short_name)
is available and such a define will create problems for packages
that use argp.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: use of program_name, (continued)
- Re: use of program_name, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/04
- Re: use of program_name, Dave Love, 2006/01/05
- Re: use of program_name, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/05
- Re: use of program_name, Karl Berry, 2006/01/05
- Re: use of program_name, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/05
- Re: use of program_name, Eric Blake, 2006/01/05
- Re: use of program_name, James Youngman, 2006/01/06
- Re: use of program_name, James Youngman, 2006/01/06
- Re: use of program_name, Karl Berry, 2006/01/06
- Re: use of program_name, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/06
- Re: use of program_name,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: use of program_name, Dave Love, 2006/01/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: use of program_name, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/09
- use of -fno-common on Darwin (was: use of program_name), Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/01/10
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/10
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/10